Customer Development with Network Effects

How does customer development differ with regards to products which require a network effect to be useful?

Short answer: No one knows.

Companies offering services such as Skype, eBay, Facebook, and others have cannot really test their value proposition without having a critical mass of users. A telephone with only one person on it is pretty useless. Yet these are some of the most lucrative inventions ever. So how do you apply the principles of customer development to these situations?

At the Startup Lessons Learned conference, I asked a panel of people far smarter than myself this question and Sean Ellis‘ response was, “It’s a modified approach that really hasn’t been defined in a structured way as Four Steps to the Epiphany lays out.” He then invited anyone who can figure it out to write a blog post on the subject.

Well, I haven’t figured it out. I will however throw out some suggestions for testing and I’ll let you know if they work later.

Narrow the Market (Sean Ellis)

Sean Ellis did turn around and make at least one good suggestion such as, “The value proposition is a moving target.” He suggests trying to narrow the target market so you can test networking effects with less risk. For example, eBay could have tested auctioning in the pez dispenser market instead of allowing any product to be sold. (His example, not mine)

Under Eric Ries‘ terminology, this would be a Zoom-In Pivot and it’s something we’re also trying with startupSQUARE.

We started out letting all sorts of people into our site in alpha state to test it out.

However, we found that the level of interaction (people posting ideas and profiles) was very very low. Far lower than our conversion rate and customer interviews would predict. When doing follow up interviews we found that people would look for other users in a very small niche industry (we have an overly large industry list) and find no one there.

With no one there, it sent a clear signal that posting a profile wasn’t worth the effort because no one else would read it.

Our solution to this is two fold.

First, our industry list is horrendously complicated. Although some users have indicated they would like a more detailed list, we have to start with a simpler list. When the list has broader categories, users will be find more people in each category and thus have a higher level of social proof.

Second, we’re modifying our signup process to collect more information when signing up, including industry interests. This will allow us to let in critical mass groups from each vertical we want to target. We’ll also be able to test the size of the group necessary for the network to have value and better analyze any behavioral difference between users of different industries.

Test Interaction on a Smaller Level (Brant Cooper)

Brant Cooper offered the example of Jeff Smith from Sonicmule who built products to test specific things such as social applications. Behold: the SonicLighter. Without hearing the specifics from Jeff, it’s tough to discuss this. Still, sounds like a great idea. Try to simplify the amount of interaction necessary, potentially in a different context. If anyone has thoughts on this, I’d love to hear them.

Funniest Answer (David Binetti)

David Binetti had the funniest answer. He just shook his head with a grimace when Sean asked if any of the panelists had an answer.

There is Still a Problem

Although no one really has a definitive answer, I would propose that the general customer development thesis can still be tested, even with network effect driven products, for a simple reason: The customer still has a problem.

The telephone allows people to communicate. Ebay allows people to sell things in a marketplace. OkCupid allows people to get laid…err…I mean meet people. All these companies target established customer needs which have clear analogies in the real world. Facebook was based on…well…a facebook of people on campus.

In many ways, customer development should have been easier for these companies since the customer problem was really already established. “Who was that hot girl in class today?” (Facebook’s initial customer problem.)

Nothing prevents you from establishing your hypotheses and verifying them with customers outside of the building via a good old fashion customer interview. “Do you have a lot of old junk you want to get rid of? Would you like to sell it? Where have you tried to sell it? What would make it easier to sell it?” Tada! eBay.

Fake It

Another tidbit that I think is valuable is faking data. That sounds bad. Let’s say, “Bootstrapping Data”. When you do your mockups, don’t use “Lorem Ipsum blah blah blah”. But in real names, real text, and real data. Get your friends to post things in your alpha. Post 100 times yourself. Farhad from Atracted.com bootstrapped his first few video personal ads by throwing a party, inviting a lot of cute girls, then sticking them in front of a computer to introduce themselves. Brilliant! Plus he got to have a party with a lot of cute girls!

The Real Video

In case you wanted the full video, here’s the embed starting Cindy Alvarez, Product Manager, KISSMetrics * David Binetti, Founder and CEO, Votizen * Brant Cooper, Principal, Market By Numbers * Matt Johnson, Grockit * Moderator: Sean Ellis. My question appears around 28:00

Watch live video from Startup Lessons Learned on Justin.tv

So…what should I post next? Tweet to tell me what to write:

Show me how to test product market fit!

or

How can I do lean startup in my friggin' huge company?

4 comments

  1. Pingback: SKMurphy » Startup Lessons Learned Conference Coverage Roundup

  2. Hi,

    I think this is really an important subject. CustDev as exists today does not touch the particular challenges that companies with marketplace-like structures face.

    I asked on the Lean Startup Circle about this and I got some useful links, but there’s still much to do on this space.

    Here’s the link: http://groups.google.com/group/lean-startup-circle/browse_thread/thread/8aff99c9c7c65bd0/1f4ecffbf60fcf48#1f4ecffbf60fcf48

    There’s another thread on the Lean Startup Circle that handles the same subject: http://groups.google.com/group/lean-startup-circle/browse_thread/thread/328e73b736a342c8/d282a13c68f2aa95?lnk=gst&q=marketplace#d282a13c68f2aa95

    Cheers

    José Matías

  3. Hi Jose,

    I saw those threads on LSC and thought they were valuable. The best advice I’ve heard on this subject though is still to break the market apart. So, if you have a two sided market, create a product that one side of the market will find useful as a standalone product.

    For OKC, that was personality quizes. For us, we are allowing biz guys to give feedback on biz plans to other biz guys while the lot of them look for technical co-founders. I think the same could apply in a number of different scenarios, but obviously there are limits.

    You are right on the money…”there’s still much to do on this space.”

  4. Pingback: Things I found Interesting on Twitter Today | Rory Ford

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *