Lean Healthcare – Interview with Mark Graban

(Mark Graban is an internationally-recognized expert in the field of “Lean Healthcare,” as a consultant, authorkeynote speaker, and blogger. I reached out to him to chat about his approach to applying Lean in hospitals and healthcare organizations. You can find him on Twitter or LinkedIn.)

Q: Lean has a long history in healthcare. What are some of the current trends and understanding of “lean” in hospitals and healthcare?

A: Some of the earliest experiments with Lean methods in healthcare were in Seattle in the late 1990s. Two of the longest-running examples of the adoption of Lean in healthcare include ThedaCare, a health system in Wisconsin, and Virginia Mason Medical Center, in Seattle, which have been using Lean as an improvement model and a management system for 12 or 13 years now. Those organizations, along with some others, have really embraced Lean as a new culture, modeling themselves after Toyota in some ways, while maintaining, of course, the special values and purpose of a hospital.

Even with those shining examples, however, far too many health systems have a limited view of Lean, thinking of it as just an improvement methodology or as a set of tools or projects. The best Lean success comes from adopting Lean as a culture and a management system… yet, we’re still hoping to see more of that in healthcare. It’s unfortunately easier for people to adopt a few new tools to use in their existing, and often dysfunctional, organizational cultures.

Lean Healthcare - It's not about applying tools haphazardly

Q: Do healthcare organizations go through the lean hype cycle when trying to adopt Lean?

A: Yes, that same cycle applies in healthcare. Healthcare organizations and leaders are as likely, as any, to want easy, quick fix, silver bullet solutions. Lean is sometimes hyped as a cure all, which I think is irresponsible. Sometimes the fault is on the people selling the ideas (or services) and sometimes we can perhaps blame the buyers who think Lean is simple and is something that can be implemented fully in a short period of time. Or they think they can hire one internal Lean expert and expect them to change the organization.

Lean methods and practices can lead to pretty quick and immediate improvements to safety, quality, patient waiting times, cost, and more. But, the greatest benefits will come from changing the culture and the management system… and that all takes time. Some organizations have gotten impatient and have fired their internal Lean or process improvement departments because they weren’t driving enough short-term cost savings, or that happened because the hospital has gotten new leadership that wasn’t convinced that Lean was a good strategy. I sometimes say that Lean doesn’t fail, but sometimes people quit practicing Lean.

Q: You wrote an article last year about how Lean applies to all forms of knowledge work and not just for manufacturing anymore. Can you please explain?

A: Lean is applicable to any situation where we are designing and managing work, delivering something to customers (products or services), and when we have people to inspire and help improve. While the term “Lean production” was used in the early book The Machine That Changed the World, Lean isn’t just about manufacturing. Even in manufacturing companies, they realized that Lean can help with product development (see the Toyota Product Development System), in sales and marketing, human resources, and other administrative functions.

Lean helps us identify value to the customer (versus waste), how to look at the end-to-end value stream (thinking systematically), and how to engage people in improvement. It’s quite a flexible methodology and management mindset. I’ve taught classes about Kaizen (continuous improvement) to groups that included people from manufacturing, healthcare, higher education, state government, software companies, and retailers. The principles and management practices are very consistent and applicable across industries (and across countries).

Lean eliminates waste...even in the healthcare industry

Q: What are the key similarities and differences in how Lean is commonly applied in large healthcare organizations compared to startups?

A: Lean Startup activities, by definition, are about creating a new product or service as a startup or within a large company. As I talked about a few years ago at The Lean Startup Conference, there are many similarities with the process a health system might go through to build a new hospital facility. The cycles of Build-Measure-Learn take place for a physical building. This process starts with getting out of the office to deeply understand the day in the life of a patient or a caregiver. Since it’s expensive to iterate an actual building, the early cycles of experimentation and learning take place on paper or in full-size cardboard mockups. This allows learning to take place early on, when modifications to the design are easier and less expensive to make.

Most Lean healthcare activity, however, is focused on the redesign or tweaking and continuous improvement of existing processes and space. A “Kaizen” approach to continuous improvement includes small improvements that take place within a team and larger “events” or projects that help drive larger changes in the existing process. This is all built around the “Deming Cycle” of Plan, Do, Study, Adjust. This is very conceptually similar to the Build-Measure-Learn cycle. Philosophically, the goals are, first, to learn and develop people and, second, to solve problems and to improve.

Mark’s passion is creating a better, safer, more cost effective healthcare system for patients and better workplaces for all. You can contact him on LeanBlog.org.

One comment

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *